Chapter 4
暂无描述。系统推荐的高质量记忆内容,适合每天坚持背诵学习。
卡片预览 (24 张)
The conformations existing under a given set of conditions are usually the ones that are
thermodynamically the most stable — that is, having the lowest free energy (G).
native protein
Proteins in any of their functional, folded conformations are often called native proteins
For the vast majority of proteins, a particular structure or small set of structures is
critical to function. However, in many cases, parts of proteins lack discernible structure. These protein segments are intrinsically disordered. In some cases, entire proteins are intrinsically disordered, yet are fully functional.
stability
Stability is the tendency of a protein to maintain a native conformation. Native proteins are only marginally stable; the ΔG separating the folded and unfolded states in typical proteins under physiological conditions is in the range of only 5 to 65 kJ/mol.
Ionic interactions may b
either stabilizing or destabilizing. We must therefore look elsewhere to understand why a particular native conformation is favored
On carefully examining the contribution of weak interactions to protein stability, we find that
the hydrophobic effect generally predominates. Pure water contains a network of hydrogen-bonded H2O molecules. No other molecule has the hydrogen-bonding potential of water, and the presence of other molecules in an aqueous solution disrupts the hydrogen bonding of water
When water surrounds a hydrophobic molecule,
, the optimal arrangement of hydrogen bonds results in a highly structured shell, or solvation layer, of water around the molecule (see Fig. 2-7). The increased order of the water molecules in the solvation layer correlates with an unfavorable decrease in the entropy of the water.
Salt bridges, especially those that are partly or entirely buried,
can thus provide significant stabilization to a protein structure. This trend explains the increased occurrence of buried salt bridges in the proteins of thermophilic organisms. Ionic interactions also limit structural flexibility and confer a uniqueness to a particular protein structure that the clustering of nonpolar groups via the hydrophobic effect cannot provide.
Peptide conformation is defined by three dihedral angles
(also known as torsion angles) called ϕ (phi), ψ (psi), and ω (omega), reflecting rotation about each of the three repeating bonds in the peptide backbone.
A dihedral angle is
the angle at the intersection of two planes.
In the case of peptides, the planes are defined by bond vectors in the peptide backbone.
Two successive bond vectors describe a plane. Three successive bond vectors describe two planes (the central bond vector is common to both; Fig. 4-2c), and the angle between these two planes is what we measure to describe peptide conformation.
good stuff on pg 491
kk
A typical protein usually has
one or more stable threedimensional conformations that reflect its function. Some proteins have segments that are intrinsically disordered but are nonetheless essential for function
Whereas nonpeptide covalent bonds, particularly disulfide bonds, can play a role in stabilization of some structures, proteins are stabilized largely by
multiple weak, noncovalent interactions and forces
The hydrophobic effect, derived from
the increase in entropy of the surrounding water when nonpolar molecules or groups are clustered together, makes the major contribution to stabilizing the globular form of most soluble proteins.
Hydrogen bonds and ionic interactions are optimized in the
thermodynamically most stable structures.
Van der Waals interactions involve
attractive forces between molecular dipoles that occur over short distances. Individually these interactions are weak, but they combine in well-packed protein structures to provide significant effects and stabilization.
The nature of the covalent bonds in the polypeptide backbone places constraints on s
n structure. The peptide bond has a partial double-bond character that keeps the entire six-atom peptide group in a rigid planar configuration. The N—Cα and Cα—C bonds can rotate to define the dihedral angles ϕ and ψ, respectively, although permitted values of ϕ and ψ are limited by steric clashes and other constraints
key convention on pg 490
kk
can reread pgs 480-490m if u want, i feel like i missed them but am not sure
kk
secondary structure
The term secondary structure refers to any chosen segment of a polypeptide chain and describes the local spatial arrangement of its main-chain atoms, without regard to the positioning of its side chains or its relationship to other segments. A regular secondary structure occurs when each dihedral angle, ϕ and ψ, remains the same or nearly the same throughout the segment
The α-helical segments in proteins o
these dihedral angles, and they even vary somewhat within a single, continuous segment so as to produce subtle bends or kinks in the helical axis
In summary, five types of constraints affect the stability of an α helix:
(1) the intrinsic propensity of an amino acid residue to form an α helix; (2) the interactions between R groups, particularly those spaced three (or four) residues apart; (3) the bulkiness of adjacent R groups; (4) the occurrence of Pro and Gly residues; and (5) interactions between amino acid residues at the ends of the helical segment and the electric dipole inherent to the α helix.
The tendency of a given segment of a polypeptide chain to 502 form an α helix therefore depends on
the identity and sequence of amino acid residues within the segment.