Linguistics - Universals
No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.
Card preview (8)
Noun phrase order cross-linguistic example
English: ‘those three big oranges’ (Dem-Num-Adj-N). Thai: ‘oranges big three those’ (N-Adj-Num-Dem)
Hierarchy-following preference
8 out of 24 possible orders match conceptual structure (Dem > Num > Adj > N). These orders are more common cross-linguistically
Artificial language learning experiment
Train participants on alien language with one modifier (e.g., ‘puku hono’ = feather that, ‘puku taka’ = feather red). Test: combine two modifiers. Result: prefer hierarchy-following order ‘puku taka hono’ (N-Adj-Dem) over other orders
Silent gesture paradigm experiment
Gesture ‘four spotty squares’ without language. Participants prefer hierarchy-following order (Dem-Num-Adj-N) even in gesture, showing it’s not just about language
Children’s noun phrase preference study
Children (less language experience) also show hierarchy-following preference, suggesting cognitive bias rather than learned language pattern
Nativist explanation for noun phrase universals
This structure (Dem > Num > Adj > N) is innate, part of human language faculty. Children don’t have to learn it
Empiricist explanation for noun phrase universals
Universal conceptual structure reflects structure of the world (properties tied to objects more than numerosity) + bias for simplicity. Languages shaped over time by cognitive biases Structure narrowing field of view
methods of testing for universals
(1) Silent gesture (different modality), (2) Children (less experience), (3) Speakers of non-hierarchy-following languages like Kiitaraka