Back to marketplace

Topic 4 - How Psychology Can Help Save the Planet

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 24•Content version: v3•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (24)

#1
Front (Question)

Environmental Psychology

Back (Answer)

an interdisciplinary, scientific field that examines human interaction with the physical environment, broadly defined to include both natural and built settings and elements

#2
Front (Question)

Ecopsychology

Back (Answer)

a perspective that focuses more on the mental health aspects of the reciprocal relationship between human and nonhuman nature

#3
Front (Question)

Ecotherapy

Back (Answer)

expanded practice of psychotherapy that moves from offices and hospitals into gardens and wilderness settings, with the goal of helping people nurture a sense of connection to their natural surroundings; also involves taking clients’ anxiety about ecological problems seriously

#4
Front (Question)

Conservation Psychology

Back (Answer)

scientific study of the reciprocal relationships between humans and the rest of nature, with a particular focus on how to encourage conservation of the natural world

#5
Front (Question)

Scientist-practitioner model

Back (Answer)

rigorous research is accompanied by active application toward solving real problems

#6
Front (Question)

Human Ecology

Back (Answer)

combined expertise from many social science disciplines to address the interplay between humans and their varied environments

#7
Front (Question)

Psychology of sustainability

Back (Answer)

a collection of psychological insights relevant to, and perhaps crucial for, creating a more sustainable world

#8
Front (Question)

Theories

Back (Answer)

explanations about how things work,

#9
Front (Question)

Empiricism

Back (Answer)

the discovery of knowledge via systematic data collection

#10
Front (Question)

Type I error

Back (Answer)

to identify a result as real, or unlikely to be due to chance, when really there is no systematic pattern

#11
Front (Question)

Type II error

Back (Answer)

to overlook a phenomenon when it actually exists

#12
Front (Question)

Precautionary Principle

Back (Answer)

encourages avoiding potential risks to human and overall ecological health, even if scientific proof of harm has not yet been fully established

#13
Front (Question)

variables

Back (Answer)

the factors under study

#14
Front (Question)

operationalized

Back (Answer)

specifically defined in terms of how it is represented and measured

#15
Front (Question)

construct

Back (Answer)

theoretical variable

#16
Front (Question)

external validity

Back (Answer)

whether a study’s conclusions should be considered applicable to populations other than the one studied

#17
Front (Question)

hypotheses

Back (Answer)

predictions about the expected relationships among variables

#18
Front (Question)

naturalistic observation

Back (Answer)

observation of public behaviours as they naturally unfold

#19
Front (Question)

Interviews and focus groups

Back (Answer)

additional exploratory methods that allow researchers to move beyond inference to hear participants’ feelings, beliefs, and attitudes about a topic

#20
Front (Question)

Laboratory Experiments

Back (Answer)

The most highly controlled method of hypothesis testing in which the goal is to isolate a cause and effect relationship.

#21
Front (Question)

independent variables (IVs)

Back (Answer)

will impact the dependent variables (DVs), to be manipulated

#22
Front (Question)

dependent variables (DVs)

Back (Answer)

impacted by the independent variables (IVs), to be measured; reserved for experimental designs

#23
Front (Question)

constant

Back (Answer)

nothing else about the experience would vary between the two sets of participants

#24
Front (Question)

conditions

Back (Answer)

different versions of the IV