Back to marketplace

COGS 110 Final

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 24•Content version: v3•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (24)

#1
Front (Question)

Thinking

Back (Answer)

going beyond the information given

#2
Front (Question)

Reasoning

Back (Answer)

drawing a conclusion based on some given information in accordance with boundary conditions specified by a task

#3
Front (Question)

Deductive Reasoning

Back (Answer)

Top down -test or confirm general statements -if;then;but;therefore

#4
Front (Question)

Inductive reasoning

Back (Answer)

bottom up approach -detect patterns -makes broad generalizations from specific observations

#5
Front (Question)

Formal Reasoning tasks

Back (Answer)

-all premises are supplied in the problem -problems are self-contained -there is typically one correct answer -unambiguous when the problem is solved -content of the problem is of limited, academic interest -problems are often solved for their own sake

#6
Front (Question)

Formal Reasoning

Back (Answer)

-Form of argument matters -logical -considered hallmark of mature and scientific thinking -piaget: hallmark of formal operational stage

#7
Front (Question)

Inductive Inferences

Back (Answer)

Depends on the number of observations and the nature of the property being projected

#8
Front (Question)

Analogical Reasoning

Back (Answer)

Understanding new problems in terms of familiar ones -ignore superficial similarities and focusing on underlying parallel relationships -piaget suggested that analogical reasoning didnt emerge until adolescence

#9
Front (Question)

Analogical Reasoning is impacted by:

Back (Answer)

Age Knowledge Meta cognition

#10
Front (Question)

Syllogistic Reasoning

Back (Answer)

logical connections between unrelated points -according to piaget, did not develop until concrete operational stage

#11
Front (Question)

Scientific Thinking

Back (Answer)

Thinking in terms of abstractions or symbols, being able to think about many variables or dimensions at the same time, being able to think in terms of probabilities and proportions

#12
Front (Question)

Bayesian reasoning

Back (Answer)

making decisions under uncertainty

#13
Front (Question)

Theories of Language Acquisition

Back (Answer)

Nativist Theories (Chomsky) Constructivist Theories (Tomasello)

#14
Front (Question)

Nativist Theories

Back (Answer)

-Chomsky -children born with innate kanguage skills (universal grammar) -Language Acquisition Device (LAD): hypothetical brain mechanism

#15
Front (Question)

Constructivist Theories

Back (Answer)

-Tomasello -kids acquire language through interaction with the environment, people, and usage of other cognitive and social processes

#16
Front (Question)

Beginning of cooperative communication

Back (Answer)

10-12 months -infants use joint attention ot communicate -often point to things

#17
Front (Question)

Theories of word learning

Back (Answer)

statistical learning social learning

#18
Front (Question)

Halophrase

Back (Answer)

one unit utterances with intonation and communicative purpose

#19
Front (Question)

Evidence for nativist theory (language is innate)

Back (Answer)

-novel phrases -children dont make certain grammatical errors -errors they do make are not likely learned —-but have not found LAD in brain

#20
Front (Question)

Evidence for behaviorist approaches: language is reinforced

Back (Answer)

-kids correct their mistakes -much learning is through association BUT kids generally correct their own errors, even without feedback

#21
Front (Question)

Innteractionist aprroach

Back (Answer)

language is both biological and social -kids are motivatied to learn lang through a desire to communicate with others

#22
Front (Question)

relationship between language and thought

Back (Answer)

symbolic function

#23
Front (Question)

Linguistic relativity hypothesis

Back (Answer)

language shapes and may even determine the way people of a certain culture perceive and understand the world

#24
Front (Question)

Cryptotypes

Back (Answer)

semantic differences were caused by the differences between each languages’ grammatical form classes -we dont think about them but they represent how we think about the world - Not a formal rule, but just something that you don’t say Ex: un — uncover, uncoil. But you don’t say unbreak