Task 5 - GROUP POLITICS
No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.
Card preview (24)
• Group Politics. What?
–> Interest groups as major link btw gov and the governed
• Group Politics. Name the 3 groups
• Communal groups • Institutional groups • Associated groups
1.1 Communal groups
–> Embedded in social fabric • Membership based on birth • Shared heritage • Traditional bonds and loyalties Ex: Families, tribes, castes, ethnic groups
1.2 Institutional groups
–> Part of the machinery of gov • Attempt to exert influence in and through it • No autonomy • May become main form of interest articulation (authoritarian regimes) Ex: Bureaucracy, military
1.3 Associational groups
–> Formed by ppl who purse shared goals • voluntary action • common interests / aspirations • feature of industrialized state Ex: Interest or pressure groups
1.3 Associational groups. Interest groups characteristics
-> Main function: Deal w gov and public bodies • variety of forms • variety of concerns • local, national or international
1.3 Interest groups. Name the 2 classifications
• sectional or promotional groups • insider or outisder groups
1.3.1 Sectional groups
• to advance / protect interests of members • represent a section of society • ex: trade unions, business corps, trade associations, professional bodies
1.3.2 Promotional groups
• to advance shared values, ideals or principles • promote collective not selective benefits • help groups other than members • ex: NGOs
1.3.3 Insider groups
• enjoy regular, privileged and institut. access to gov • overlap btw sectional and insider • with objectives broadly compatible with those of gov + demonstrate that members abide by decisions
1.3.4 Outsider groups
• not consulted by gov / consulted irregularly • often as weakness • some choose to be preservation of ideological purity protect decentralized power structures
• MODELS OF GPs. Name the 3
• Pluralism • Corporatism • The New Right
2.1 pluralist model. Core theme and concept
–> stress capacity of Gs to defend individual from gov and promote democracy • Core theme: pol power is fragmented • decisions through complex process • ensures views of larger number of groups
2.1 pluralist model. some characteristics
• larger representation • with spread of behavioralism • GPs as the core of democratic process • characterized by balance of power • potential replacement of pol parties
2.1 pluralist model. drawbacks
• elitists: only recognize one face of power (ability to influence decision-making • marxists: pol power closely linked to ownership of ruling class • neo-marxists: unequal comp btw business and labour groups • glob: process leads to corporate takeover of gov
2.2 corporatist model. core theme and concept
-> analyze closer links that developed in industralized societies btw groups and state • corporatism: social theory emphasizing privilege of some groups in relation to gov more influence on public policy!
2.2 corporatist model. characteristics
• symbiotic relation btw gov and groups • present in all advanced ind. states? • seek ‘insider’ status (more access to policy formulation) • privileges econ or functional groups (form of tripartitism?)
2.2 corporatist model. drawbacks
• may leave part of society out • too much privilege to few • portrays hierarchical order and leader domination mechanism of social control? • threat to democracy (decisions outside democratic reach) • gov captured by consulted groups
2.3 new right model. central theme and concept
-> antipathy towards interest groups derived from individualism that lies at neoliberal economics
2.3 new right model. characteristics
• self-reliance and entrepreneuralism • concern for corporatism and escalating public spending • concerned with over-gov • argue that interest Gs exist to secure public goods free-riders no true common interest (question pol voice) • argue that it benefits small groups • see it as main determinant for econ failure
• PATTERNS OF GPs. principle factors determining their influence
• political culture • institutional culture • party politics • nature and style of public policy
3.1 political culture. 2 reasons why its crucial
• determines whether IGs are seen as legitimate or non-legitimate actors • affects willingness of ppl to form/join organized IGs or to engage in politics - regimes may practice monism ensure gov control - regimes can encourage IGs (japan, usa) ensure freedom - regimes can see it w suspicion (france) undermine general will of ppl
3.2 institutional culture. distinction btw unitary and fragmented systems
unitary/centralized - tend to narrow scope of GP - concentrated around exec branch of gov - more capacity of gov to decide whether to respond fragmented/decentralized - reflects impact of bicameralism, separation of powers and federalism - super vulnerable: more access points - stimulus of group formation - ‘veto’ groups
3.3 party politics.
-> complex relationship w IGs - some senses rivals - broader aggregation of interests/ideological goals - IGs seek narrower objectives to exert influence in and through parties