Back to marketplace

PSYCH 176 Final

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 7•Content version: v4•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (7)

#1
Front (Question)

Group creativity and decision making is a key to _____. It is analogous to ________ in individual creativity and decision making

Back (Answer)

good group decision making and harnessing value of diverse opinions analogous to breadth of knowledge in individual creativity

#2
Front (Question)

Why is averaging powerful?

Back (Answer)

statistical principle: the average of the individual estimates will be at least as accurate as the average individual performance deviation from truth(error) = systematic bias +random error as bracketing increases, so does power of averaging. (EX: 2 unbiased, uncorrelated judges will have 50% bracketing rate)

#3
Front (Question)

People tend to underestimate the value of ______ and instead “Chase the expert”

Back (Answer)

averaging it is rare that the individual will consistently outperform the group

#4
Front (Question)

If judgements are not made independently, they _____-

Back (Answer)

converge this greatly reduces the benefits of combining individual judgements

#5
Front (Question)

Asch Experiment (1951)

Back (Answer)

Brought you into a room with other people -you perform a visual perception task: Judge line lengths – which one is the most similar to the test line • having just 1 other subject in the experiment drastically reduces conformity • 3 stooges results in more conformity than 8 stooges plus one other subject • with 2 stooges and 16 subjects, stooges get laughed at • the less clear the correct answer is, the more conformity

#6
Front (Question)

4 Primary Themes of the Class

Back (Answer)

• Being creative is risky • immediate focus on small number of alternatives • The role of knowledge • Accessing knowledge

#7
Front (Question)

What can affect group influence

Back (Answer)

• degree of cohesion • attraction to group and current level of cohesion may affect willingness to contradict others • strong attraction coupled with low cohesion is the problem • confidence in acceptance by group is a critical variable