Kinetics 4: Complex reactions: pre-equilibrium, steady state, MM
No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.
Card preview (24)
Define an elementary step.
An elementary step is a single reactive encounter between species – is the smallest unit of a reaction.
Define (kinetic) mechanism.
A proposed set of elementary steps accounting for the features of a reaction.
Define an elementary reaction
Consists of a single elementary step
Elementary reaction: Cl + O2 –> ClO + O, with rate constant k Write the rate of change for each species.
elementary reaction means rate laws can be taken directly from eq since everything is simultaneous

The complex reaction below occurs in 2 elementary steps. Write the rate of change of: • product • carbocation

• to calculate how [P] changes with time, the diff eqs must be integrated, which is possible here but gets complex as more steps are added, since a given variable appears in multiple eqs.* • Hard to solve w/o computer, so the following methods remove some of the complex time-dependence by making assumptions about the relative rates of processes.*

Two sequential, first-order reactions, with rate constants k1 and k2: A –> B (1) B –> C (2) Suppose k1 << k2. Draw conc of each species against time on the same axes, and state which step is rate-determining.
1 is the RDS process 1 has smaller rate constant therefore slower

Two sequential, first-order reactions, with rate constants k1 and k2: A –> B (1) B –> C (2) Suppose k1 >> k2. Draw conc of each species against time on the same axes, and state which step is rate-determining.
2 is the RDS process 2 has smaller rate constant therefore slower

Study the reaction scheme below. What conditions are required for the pre-equilibrium hypothesis to apply?

• Rate of process 1 >> rate of process 2 • Such that rates of [1] and [-1] are equal (i.e. equilibrium is established between E, H3O+ and EH+) • And therefore process [2] is rate-determining pre-eq hypothesis is often useful for intermediates involving protonation or deprotonation, since these processes are usually faster than breaking/making bonds to atoms heavier than hydrogen
Study the reaction scheme below. Use the pre-equilibrium hypothesis to derive an expression for the rate equation for formation of products.

Rate of process 1 >> rate of process 2, such that rates of [1] and [-1] are equal (in equilibrium), and process [2] is rate-determining: k1[E][H3O]+ = k-1[EH+][H2O] So [EH]+ = (k1/k-1)([E][H3O]+/[H2O]) = keq([E][H3O]+/[H2O]) r = d[P]/dt = k2[EH+][H2O] = k2keq([E][H3O]+) • pre-eq hypothesis makes final rate eq simpler since it involves only reactants, so can be integrated as in previous sections* • Could then find experimentally that rate = kexp([E][H3O]+/[H2O]) – comparing with theoretical rate law would show kexp is a composite of the rate constants of 3 steps*
What conditions permit using the steady state approximation? Include a graph of concentration against time.
Applicable when, in a complex mechanism, a reactive intermediate reacts as soon as it’s formed, such that its concentration is assumed to be constant. Only applicable when reaction is in steady state - not in the initial or final phases. simplifies solving differential eqs since it removes the time dependence

Consider the sequential reaction A –> B –> C with rate constants k1 and k2. Use the steady state approximation to derive an expression for the rate of product formation.
as expected, eq indicates B reacts as soon as it’s formed, such that the first step of the reaction is the RDS.

In the reaction scheme below, EH+ is assumed to be in the steady state. Derive an expression for the rate of formation of products.

r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k1+k2)) x [E][H3O]+ general process • identify the intermediate(s) • write the rate law for each, each reaction producing/consuming the intermediate contributes a term to the expression, those consuming it give negative terms • set this = 0 • rearrange for [intermediate]ss • write rate law for products, sub in [intermediate], simplify
In the reaction scheme below, EH+ is assumed to be in the steady state. The rate of formation of products is given by: r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k1+k2)) x [E][H3O]+ Suppose the rate of [2] >> that of [-1]. Simplify the expression.

k2[EH+][H2O] >> k-1[EH+][H2O] Therefore k2 >> k1 Approximate denominator (k1+k2) = k2 So rate law becomes r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k2)) x [E][H3O]+ = k1[E][H3O]+ reaction is effectively 2 sequential steps (since -1 is negligable), with the first being slower, so rate depends on [1] only since it’s the RDS
In the reaction scheme below, EH+ is assumed to be in the steady state. The rate of formation of products is given by: r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k-1+k2)) x [E][H3O]+ Suppose the rate of [-1] >> that of [2]. Simplify the expression.

k2[EH+][H2O] << k-1[EH+][H2O] Therefore k2 << k-1 Approximate denominator (k-1+k2) = k-1 So rate law becomes r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k-1)) x [E][H3O]+ = keqk2[E][H3O]+ NB identical to rate law derived assuming [1] and [-1] form a pre-equilibrium. this is since assuming that rate of [-1] >> [2] assumes an equilibrium is set up, and that [2] is a slow RDS, ie bleeding off of EH+
try page 36 on notes, decomposition of N205
What is saturation kinetics?
Where, for a fixed quantity of enzyme, as [S] increases, the rate of reaction first increases linearly, then levels off to a limiting maximum value.

Write out the Michaelis-Menten scheme.

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten scheme. • Give the expression for KM • What units does it have? • define it

kM = (k-1 + kcat)/k1) Units of conc KM is the substrate conc which gives ha;f-maximum velocity.
Shown is the Michaelis-Menten scheme. Write the Michaelis-Menten equation, i.e. the expression for the velocity, V (ie rate) of reaction.

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + (k-1 + kcat)/k1) = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM) where KM is the michaelis constant
Shown is the Michaelis-Menten scheme. Using the steady state approximation, derive the Michaelis-Menten equation, ie the expression for the velocity, V (ie rate) of reaction.

Assume ES in steady state since intermediate So d[ES]/dt = k1[E][S] - k-1[ES] -kcat[ES] = 0 Derive an expression for [E], then plug into the above (so that [ES] is the only unknown, given [E]0 is known) [E]0 = [ES] + [E] –> [E] = [E]0 - [ES] k1([E]0 - [ES])[S] - k-1[ES] -kcat[ES] = 0 Rearrange for [ES] [ES]ss = (k1[E]0[S])/(k1[S]+ k-1 + kcat) Plug [ES] into the expression for velocity (rate) d[P]/dt = V = kcat[ES] = (kcatk1[E]0[S])/(k1[S]+ k-1 + kcat) divide through by k1 V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + (k-1 + kcat)/k1) = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM) where KM is the michaelis constant
Shown is the Michaelis-Menten equation. V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM) Dependence of V on [S] is complex, so V is measured for the initial rate. When substrate conc is low: • Simplify the equation • State the order of reaction in [S] and [E]0 • State the rate constant and its order • Give the biological interpretation

[S] << KM so simplify denominator: V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / kM 1st order in [S] and [E]0 2nd order rate constant kcat/KM There is more free enzyme than substrate-bound enzyme, so rate is limited by substrate availability, hence first order in [S].
Shown is the Michaelis-Menten scheme. Write the expression for Vmax and define it.

Vmax = kcat[E]0 Maximum velocity which occurs when all enzyme is saturated, i.e. 0 order in [S].
Shown is the Michaelis-Menten equation. V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM) Dependence of V on [S] is complex, so V is measured for the initial rate. When substrate conc is high: • Simplify the equation • State the order of reaction in [S] and [E]0 • State the rate constant and its order • Give the biological interpretation • State the RDS

[S] >> KM so simplify denominator: V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / [S] = kcat[E]0 = Vmax 0 order in [S], 1st order in [E]0 1st order rate constant kcat Velocity is independent of S, due to saturation of V: enzymes all substate-bound so adding S has no effect. RDS = ES –> E+ P
Shown is the Michaelis-Menten equation. V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM) Substitute in the expression for Vmax and use this to interpret the meaning of Km.

Vmax = kcat[E]0 V = (Vmax[S]) / ([S] + kM) Substate conc [S]1/2 results in half the max velocity Vmax/2 = (Vmax[S]1/2) / ([S]1/2 + KM) So 1/2 = ([S]1/2) / ([S]1/2 + KM) So ([S]1/2 + KM) = 2[S]1/2 Thus [S]1/2 = KM So KM is the substrate conc which gives half-maximum velocity.