Back to marketplace

W5L2 - fMRI Research 2

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 7•Content version: v4•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (7)

#1
Front (Question)

What is reverse inference

Back (Answer)

Drawing conclusions about cognitive processes from the presence of activation

#2
Front (Question)

What is the steps/logic in reverse inference, where is the problem

Back (Answer)

• ) This study: Task A, Brain Region Z active • ) Other study: Cognitive process X, Brain Region Z active • ) Hence, Activation of Z = Cognitive Process X Problem: (2) Not exclusive. Brain Region Z activate for many other cognitive processes/tasks

#3
Front (Question)

Example of Reverse Inference Problem: Pre-Frontal Cortex. What has been suggested of anterior and posterior regions

Back (Answer)

More anterior regions (front) = Abstract Information • Dorsal Axis: Abstractness of Rules • Ventral Axis: Abstractness of Memory Representation More posterior regions (back) = Specific content

#4
Front (Question)

Example of Reverse Inference Problem: Pre-Frontal Cortex. What other studies found

Back (Answer)

Frontal cortex activated in lots of tasks - Relative specialization instead of absolute specialization. “More strongly” as task difficult increases

#5
Front (Question)

What is the “Multi-Demand” Network

Back (Answer)

Activation in a region - Does not imply region is doing that. Many regions interact with one another for cognitive task

#6
Front (Question)

In examining cognitive processes, what are the 2 things experiments must ensure

Back (Answer)

• ) Quality of Task -> Experiment must manipulate cognitive process of interest • ) Specificity of Region -> Is it only this region that is activated?

#7
Front (Question)

Why can’t we interpret null results in fMRI

Back (Answer)

No region was significantly stronger activated for task A vs. task B. Cannot conclude region is not involved in A/B • ) Statistical tests make it difficult for H1, not for H0 - can’t interpret null • ) Our method might just not be sensitive enough to detect small differences (e.g. 3x3x3mm. Might not pick up layer-dependent activity)