Back to marketplace

periodicity– transition metals

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 24•Content version: v4•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (24)

#1
Front (Question)

what are transition metals? (short defin.)

Back (Answer)

• a d-block element that forms 1 or more stable ions w partially filled d subshell

#2
Front (Question)

what are the exceptions in the transition metals?

Back (Answer)

Zn, Sc3+, Cu+

#3
Front (Question)

why is Zn not considered a transition metal?

Back (Answer)

• it forms only 1 ion, Zn2+ • Zn2+ has a fully filled d subshell

#4
Front (Question)

why is Sc3+ not considered a transition metal?

Back (Answer)

it has no e- in its d subshell

#5
Front (Question)

why is Cu+ not a transition metal?

Back (Answer)

it has a fully filed d subshell

#6
Front (Question)

____ orbitals are filled before ___

Back (Answer)

4s, 3d

#7
Front (Question)

in transition metals, 4s is filled before 3d except for…

Back (Answer)

Cr and Cu

#8
Front (Question)

why do Cr and Cu not have a fully filled 4s orbital?

Back (Answer)

• Cr -> 3d orbitals are half filled and more stable than fully filled 4s • Cu -> 3d orbitals are fully filled and stable

#9
Front (Question)

d-block metals have a [higher/lower] m.p. compared to s-block metals

Back (Answer)

higher

#10
Front (Question)

is the atomic radii of transition metals generally larger or smaller than s-block metals?

Back (Answer)

smaller

#11
Front (Question)

transition metals are [more/less] dense than s-block metals

Back (Answer)

more

#12
Front (Question)

_____ metals are poorer conductors of electricity compared to ______ metals

Back (Answer)

s-block, d-block

#13
Front (Question)

why is the atomic and ionic radii of d-block elements smaller than s-block elements?

Back (Answer)

• d subshell SE not as effective as p subshell • as d subshells are more diffused • valence shell for d-block elements exp greater nuclear attraction -> smaller radii

#14
Front (Question)

how does the atomic radius change across the period and why?

Back (Answer)

• decr slightly: • due to nuclear charge incr slightly -> SE incr slightly -> ENC increases slightly • thus radius decr slightly

#15
Front (Question)

what is the trend for ionisation energies across the period?

Back (Answer)

• incr slightly

#16
Front (Question)

why does ionisation energies incr slightly from s-block to d-block

Back (Answer)

• p subshell provides better shielding than d subshell • d subshells more diffused • valence shell of d-block elements exp greater nuclear attraction • thus greater IE for d-block

#17
Front (Question)

there is a ______ incr from 1st to 2nd IE, and a _______ incr from 2nd to 3rd IE

Back (Answer)

small, large

#18
Front (Question)

there is a small incr from 1st to 2nd IE because…

Back (Answer)

both first and second electrons are removed from the same orbital, 4s

#19
Front (Question)

the large increase from 2nd to 3rd IE in d block elements is because…

Back (Answer)

• third electron is removed from 3d subshells • SE decr -> ENC incr

#20
Front (Question)

why is the 2nd IE of Mn lower than that of Cr?

Back (Answer)

• 2nd e- removed from Mn is 4s • 2nd e- removed from Cr is 3d • 4s is in outer shell -> experiences weaker ENC

#21
Front (Question)

why is the 3rd IE of Mn>Fe?

Back (Answer)

• Fe = 3d6 • electron removed is in the same orbital as another electron • inter-electronic repulsion • thus less energy req

#22
Front (Question)

why do trans elements have greater m.p. than s-block?

Back (Answer)

• 3d + 4s energies are relatively similar • TM can lose more valence e- • thus more delocalised e- • stronger electrostatic FOA btw metal cation and sea of delocalised e- • TMS have stronger metallic bonding -> higher m.p.

#23
Front (Question)

what is the trend of m.p. across the d-block?

Back (Answer)

incr then decr

#24
Front (Question)

why does m.p. increase from Sc to Cr?

Back (Answer)

• Cr has 5 unpaired e- (3d) • Sc has 1 unpaired e- (3d) • Cr has more unpaired e- in 3d subshell • thus stronger metallic bonding