Back to marketplace

Chapter 4

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 24•Content version: v3•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (24)

#1
Front (Question)

civil rights

Back (Answer)

things concerning a more equitable and fair society

#2
Front (Question)

civil liberties

Back (Answer)

things to inhibit government encroachment and usually to defend the bill of rights (first 10 amendments)

#3
Front (Question)

Thomas Jefferson on human rights

Back (Answer)

took the words of John Locke, derives inalienable human rights from nature

#4
Front (Question)

article 1 (section 9)

Back (Answer)

prohibits bills of attainders, ex post facto laws, and limits Congressional powers to suspend writ of habeas corpus

#5
Front (Question)

Were the Federalists cool with the Constitution without the additional bill of rights?

Back (Answer)

for the most part, yes. Alexander Hamilton critiques that the Constitution doesn’t protect private lives as it regulates just political matters.

#6
Front (Question)

Anti-Federalists thoughts on Constitution and bills of rights and whatnot

Back (Answer)

they thought that the constitution wasn’t enough to do the job but and they thought that the bill of rights was a good idea. Robert Yates aka Brutus thinks that the government will undoubtedly expand (which it did by a lot).

#7
Front (Question)

Barron v. Baltimore

Back (Answer)

Supreme Court says that the bill of rights only applied to actions of the federal government.

#8
Front (Question)

Saenz v. Roe

Back (Answer)

protects the right to travel from one state to another

#9
Front (Question)

Sherbert v. Werner

Back (Answer)

states cant deny unemployment benefits who turned down the job because it required them to work on Sundays.

#10
Front (Question)

McDonald v. Chicago

Back (Answer)

incorporated the second amendment into state law

#11
Front (Question)

Near v. Minnesota

Back (Answer)

ruled against censorship with few exceptions

#12
Front (Question)

blue law

Back (Answer)

a law originally created to uphold a religious or moral standard, such as a prohibition against selling alcohol on Sundays

#13
Front (Question)

common-law right

Back (Answer)

a right of the people rooted in legal tradition and past court rulings, rather than the Constitution

#14
Front (Question)

conscientious objector

Back (Answer)

a person who claims the right to refuse to perform military service on the grounds of freedom of thought, conscience, or religion

#15
Front (Question)

establishment clause

Back (Answer)

the provision of the First Amendment that prohibits the government from endorsing a state-sponsored religion; interpreted as preventing government from favoring some religious beliefs over others or religion over non-religion

#16
Front (Question)

exclusionary rule

Back (Answer)

a requirement, from Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio, that evidence obtained as a result of an illegal search or seizure cannot be used to try someone for a crime

#17
Front (Question)

free exercise clause

Back (Answer)

the provision of the First Amendment that prohibits the government from regulating religious beliefs and practices

#18
Front (Question)

prior restraint

Back (Answer)

a government action that stops someone from doing something before they are able to do it (e.g., forbidding someone to publish a book he or she plans to release)

#19
Front (Question)

probable cause

Back (Answer)

legal standard for determining whether a search or seizure is constitutional or a crime has been committed; a lower threshold than the standard of proof needed at a criminal trial

#20
Front (Question)

search warrant

Back (Answer)

a legal document, signed by a judge, allowing police to search and/or seize persons or property

#21
Front (Question)

Sherbert test

Back (Answer)

a standard for deciding whether a law violates the free exercise clause; a law will be struck down unless there is a “compelling governmental interest” at stake and it accomplishes its goal by the “least restrictive means” possible

#22
Front (Question)

symbolic speech

Back (Answer)

a form of expression that does not use writing or speech but nonetheless communicates an idea (e.g., wearing an article of clothing to show solidarity with a group)

#23
Front (Question)

obscenity

Back (Answer)

acts or statements that are extremely offensive by contemporary standards

#24
Front (Question)

double jeopardy

Back (Answer)

a prosecution pursued twice at the same level of government for the same criminal action