Back to marketplace

Task 5 - REPRESENTATION AND ELECTIONS

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 23•Content version: v4•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (23)

#1
Front (Question)

• Theories of Representation. Name the 4

Back (Answer)

• Trusteeship • Delegation • The Mandate • Resemblance

#2
Front (Question)

1.1 Trusteeship model. Who + Core theme

Back (Answer)

–> Trustee: Person who acts on behalf of other using superior knowledge and greater experience Core theme: Serve constituents through mature judgement + enlightened conscience

#3
Front (Question)

1.1 Trusteeship model. Characterstics (4)

Back (Answer)

1.Representation as moral duty (actions in the interest of the less fortunate) 2. Elitist implications 3. ‘Mass does not know their best interest’ 4. Anti-democratic implications

#4
Front (Question)

1.1 Trusteeship Model. Drawbacks

Back (Answer)

• Knowledge is unequally distributed • No evidence that education = altruism • Elitist • Anti-democratic

#5
Front (Question)

1.2 Delegate Model. who?

Back (Answer)

–> Delegate: Acts as a conduit conveying views of others (no own judgement)

#6
Front (Question)

1.2 Delegate Model. Characteristics

Back (Answer)

• Politicians bound to views of represented • Elections • Short terms • Use of referendum • Broader opportunities for pop participation • Checks self-serving inclinations

#7
Front (Question)

1.2 Delegate Model. Drawbacks

Back (Answer)

• Breeds narrowness • Fosters conflicts • Limits scope of leadership and statemanship

#8
Front (Question)

1.3 Mandate Model. Who?

Back (Answer)

–> In winning election, a party gains popular mandate that authorizes it to carry out policies and programmes outlined during campaign

#9
Front (Question)

1.3 Mandate Model. Characteristics

Back (Answer)

• Politicians serve by remaining loyal to their party and policies • Provides a meaning on election results • Keeps politicians to their word

#10
Front (Question)

1.3 Mandate Model. Drawbacks

Back (Answer)

• based on questionable model of voting behavior (voters not always rational) • manifesto commitments • imposes straitjacket (limits gov to policies taken during election) • applied in case of majoritarian systems

#11
Front (Question)

1.4 Resemblance Model. Who?

Back (Answer)

–> embodied in idea of a ‘representative cross-section’, who constitute a micocosm of the larger society

#12
Front (Question)

1.4 Resemblance Model. Characteristics

Back (Answer)

• representation of all society groups • descriptive • only a member of minority group can represent the interests of the group • better decisions for common good • e.g cantones

#13
Front (Question)

• ELECTIONS. Functions of elections. Name 3 views

Back (Answer)

• Conventional • Radical • Reality

#14
Front (Question)

2.1 Functions of elections. Conventional view

Back (Answer)

–> Mechanism for pol to be called to account and forced to introduce policies reflecting public opinion - Pol recruitments - Making gov - Influencing policy

#15
Front (Question)

2.1 FoE. Radical view

Back (Answer)

–> Means through which govs and pol elites can exercise control over their populations - Building legitimacy - shaping pulic opinion - strengthening elites

#16
Front (Question)

2.1 FoE. Reality

Back (Answer)

–> Two-way street - Gov and people, elites and the masses haev an opportunity to influence each other

#17
Front (Question)

2.2 Electoral systems. What?

Back (Answer)

Set of rules that governs the conduct of elections. They vary accross the world

#18
Front (Question)

2.2 Majoritarian vs Proportional systems. Based on how they convert votes into seats

Back (Answer)

• Majoritarian: larger parties win a higher proportion of seats than the proportion of votes they gain in election (more chances for small parties) • Proportional: Guarantee an equal relationship btw the seats won by a party and the votes gained in the election - Multiparty systems and coalition

#19
Front (Question)

2.2 The Debate: Majoritarian advantages

Back (Answer)

• Evaluated in terms of gov functions (stable rule): • proper and clear translation of manifesto into programme • effective rule

#20
Front (Question)

2.2. Debate: Majoritarian disadvantages

Back (Answer)

• Evaluated in terms of representation: Distorts pop preferences Unfairness to large parties Overfairness to large parties and geographically concentrated support Two-party systems manufactured (Do not reflect the distribution of pop preferences)

#21
Front (Question)

2.2 Debate: Proportional systems. Advantages

Back (Answer)

Evaluated in terms of rep functions: • Coalition govs are usually unstable • Endless process of reconciling opposing views • Internal splits and divisions

#22
Front (Question)

2.2 Debate: Proportional systems. Disadvantages

Back (Answer)

Evaluated in terms of gov functions: • Coalition govs are usually unstable • Endless process of reconciling opposing views • Internal splits and divisions

#23
Front (Question)

Back (Answer)