Back to marketplace

Topic 8: Crystal Field Theory Part 1

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 17•Content version: v4•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (17)

#1
Front (Question)

Trend of lattice energies (-U) Ca to Zn

Back (Answer)

Decrease apart from Mn and Zn

#2
Front (Question)

Trend of hydration energies Ca to Zn

Back (Answer)

Decrease apart from Mn and Zn

#3
Front (Question)

Crystal Field Theory

Back (Answer)

A very simple ionic model which rationalises colour and magnetism (an electrostatic model)

#4
Front (Question)

Molecular Orbital Theory

Back (Answer)

A more complex, comprehensive bonding theory. Allows consideration of both covalent and ionic contributions

#5
Front (Question)

Name the 5 d-orbitals

Back (Answer)

dxy dxz dyz (lobes point between axis) dx^2-y^2 dz^2 (lobes point along axis)

#6
Front (Question)

The underlying principle of Crystal Field Theory is …

Back (Answer)

The metal is treated as a positive point charge (M^+) and the ligands as negative point charges (:L^-) which donates an electron pair

#7
Front (Question)

The 5 d-orbitals are … so have the … energy in the M^+ The spherical field of negative charge alters this by …

Back (Answer)

degenerate same repulsion of electrons in d-orbitals, causing them to increase in energy

#8
Front (Question)

Effect of d-orbitals in octahedral fields

Back (Answer)

eg: dx^2-y^2 dz^2 increases in energy by 3/5 Delta O relative to barycentre (destabilised), direct overlap with axis t2g: dxy dxz dyz deceases in energy by 2/5 Delta O relative to barycentre (stabilised), no direct overlap with axis

#9
Front (Question)

barycentre

Back (Answer)

Centre of gravity for splitting of d-orbitals 0 reference point (energy in spherical field)

#10
Front (Question)

Difference in 2 sets of d-orbitals

Back (Answer)

Delta O in octahedral Delta T in tetrahedral

#11
Front (Question)

Effect of d-orbitals in tetrahedral fields

Back (Answer)

t2: dxy dxz dyz increases in energy by 2/5 Delta T relative to barycentre (destabilised), orbitals interact more strongly with ligands e: dx^2-y^2 dz^2 deceases in energy by 3/5 Delta T relative to barycentre (stabilised), orbitals interact less strongly with ligands

#12
Front (Question)

delta O is always … than delta T because …

Back (Answer)

much larger 6 ligands rather than 4 so more stabilisation and destabilisation In delta O, ligands point directly at orbitals, don’t in delta T

#13
Front (Question)

Octahedral complexes can be … when … or … Tetrahedral complexes are always … because …

Back (Answer)

low spin delta O > P high spin high spin P always > delta T

#14
Front (Question)

How can we experimentally determine delta O?

Back (Answer)

Send an electron from t2g to eg and calculate how much energy is required (how much light is absorbed)

#15
Front (Question)

CFSE of delta O=

Back (Answer)

E = hc v bar x NA

#16
Front (Question)

As the metal’s charge increases, delta O … so the ligand moves … and …

Back (Answer)

increases closer to metal interacts more with d-orbitals

#17
Front (Question)

Strong field ligands have a … whereas weak field ligands have a …

Back (Answer)

large energy split in their d-orbitals small split