Chapter 7
No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.
Card preview (21)
actions contrary to duty
Actions that violate moral obligations.
actions for the sake of duty
Actions done purely because they are morally required, not for personal gain or inclination.
actions in accordance with duty
Actions that follow duty but are motivated by other reasons, like self-interest.
autonomous will
A will guided by reason and moral law, acting freely in accordance with duty.
heteronomous will
A will influenced by external factors, inclinations, or consequences rather than moral law.
the categorical imperative
A categorical command applies to everyone, always — not just “if you want X, do Y.” It’s unconditional and based on duty, not consequences.
universalizability
The test for moral rules: an action is right if its guiding maxim can be applied universally without contradiction.
the means-end formulation of the categorical imperative
Act so that you treat humanity, whether in yourself or others, always as an end, never merely as a means.
perfect duties
Duties that must always be followed (e.g., do not lie, do not murder).
imperfect duties
Duties that allow some discretion in how to fulfill them (e.g., help others, develop talents).
hypothetical imperatives
Conditional commands based on desired outcomes (e.g., “If you want to stay healthy, exercise”).
rules of skill
Guidelines for achieving practical ends in life (technical or instrumental rules).
the counsel of prudence
Advice for acting in one’s long-term self-interest; not moral law but practical reasoning.
retributivism
Theory that punishment is justified as deserved for wrongdoing, not for deterrence.
deterrence theory of punishment
Punishment aimed at preventing future crimes by discouraging offenders or others.
therapeutic theory of punishment
Punishment intended to rehabilitate the offender.
What did Kant consider the only unqualified good?
The good will—acting out of a pure desire to do good, regardless of consequences or personal gain.
What are the two types of hypothetical imperatives?
• Rules of skill – end and means are variable (e.g., finding a restaurant). 2. Counsels of prudence – end (happiness) is fixed, means vary.
Why does Kant reject happiness as the basis for morality?
Happiness is subjective, uncertain, and cannot provide a universally binding moral standard.
Name the four formulations of the categorical imperative.
• Act only on maxims you can will as universal law. 2. Act as if your maxims were universal laws of nature. 3. Treat humanity always as an end, never merely as a means. 4. Harmonize maxims with a possible kingdom of ends.
What is the difference between a perfect duty and an imperfect duty?
Perfect duty: specific, must always be followed (e.g., do not lie, do not commit suicide). Imperfect duty: general, allows discretion in how to fulfill it (e.g., help others, improve oneself).