Back to marketplace

Chapter 7

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 21•Content version: v4•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (21)

#1
Front (Question)

actions contrary to duty

Back (Answer)

Actions that violate moral obligations.

#2
Front (Question)

actions for the sake of duty

Back (Answer)

Actions done purely because they are morally required, not for personal gain or inclination.

#3
Front (Question)

actions in accordance with duty

Back (Answer)

Actions that follow duty but are motivated by other reasons, like self-interest.

#4
Front (Question)

autonomous will

Back (Answer)

A will guided by reason and moral law, acting freely in accordance with duty.

#5
Front (Question)

heteronomous will

Back (Answer)

A will influenced by external factors, inclinations, or consequences rather than moral law.

#6
Front (Question)

the categorical imperative

Back (Answer)

A categorical command applies to everyone, always — not just “if you want X, do Y.” It’s unconditional and based on duty, not consequences.

#7
Front (Question)

universalizability

Back (Answer)

The test for moral rules: an action is right if its guiding maxim can be applied universally without contradiction.

#8
Front (Question)

the means-end formulation of the categorical imperative

Back (Answer)

Act so that you treat humanity, whether in yourself or others, always as an end, never merely as a means.

#9
Front (Question)

perfect duties

Back (Answer)

Duties that must always be followed (e.g., do not lie, do not murder).

#10
Front (Question)

imperfect duties

Back (Answer)

Duties that allow some discretion in how to fulfill them (e.g., help others, develop talents).

#11
Front (Question)

hypothetical imperatives

Back (Answer)

Conditional commands based on desired outcomes (e.g., “If you want to stay healthy, exercise”).

#12
Front (Question)

rules of skill

Back (Answer)

Guidelines for achieving practical ends in life (technical or instrumental rules).

#13
Front (Question)

the counsel of prudence

Back (Answer)

Advice for acting in one’s long-term self-interest; not moral law but practical reasoning.

#14
Front (Question)

retributivism

Back (Answer)

Theory that punishment is justified as deserved for wrongdoing, not for deterrence.

#15
Front (Question)

deterrence theory of punishment

Back (Answer)

Punishment aimed at preventing future crimes by discouraging offenders or others.

#16
Front (Question)

therapeutic theory of punishment

Back (Answer)

Punishment intended to rehabilitate the offender.

#17
Front (Question)

What did Kant consider the only unqualified good?

Back (Answer)

The good will—acting out of a pure desire to do good, regardless of consequences or personal gain.

#18
Front (Question)

What are the two types of hypothetical imperatives?

Back (Answer)

• Rules of skill – end and means are variable (e.g., finding a restaurant). 2. Counsels of prudence – end (happiness) is fixed, means vary.

#19
Front (Question)

Why does Kant reject happiness as the basis for morality?

Back (Answer)

Happiness is subjective, uncertain, and cannot provide a universally binding moral standard.

#20
Front (Question)

Name the four formulations of the categorical imperative.

Back (Answer)

• Act only on maxims you can will as universal law. 2. Act as if your maxims were universal laws of nature. 3. Treat humanity always as an end, never merely as a means. 4. Harmonize maxims with a possible kingdom of ends.

#21
Front (Question)

What is the difference between a perfect duty and an imperfect duty?

Back (Answer)

Perfect duty: specific, must always be followed (e.g., do not lie, do not commit suicide). Imperfect duty: general, allows discretion in how to fulfill it (e.g., help others, improve oneself).