Back to marketplace

Energetics & Equilibria 4: Equilibrium

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 15•Content version: v4•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (15)

#1
Front (Question)

Write the expressions for the eq constant for the following reaction involving • gases • dissolved species • solids and liquids A + B ⇔ P + Q

Back (Answer)

solids: trick question, solid species don’t contribute to expression

Card back image
#2
Front (Question)

Why do solids and liquids in reactions not contribute a term to the eq constant expression?

Back (Answer)

Chemical potentials of solids/liquids = standard chemical potentials I.e. µ = µo, so the term that solid A with coefficient vA = (µ/µo)vA = 1. Therefore the contribution is to multiply the overall expression by 1 – no change.

#3
Front (Question)

What is true of Gibbs energy at equilibrium?

Back (Answer)

∆rG = 0 Effectively, ∆rG is the slope of a graph of Gibbs energy against composition, composition being the ratio of products to reactants. See image

Card back image
#4
Front (Question)

Give the expression linking the standard Gibbs energy of reaction and the equilibrium constant.

Back (Answer)

∆rGo = -RTlnK

#5
Front (Question)

Derive that ∆rGo = -RTlnK

Back (Answer)

Assume generic reaction A + B ⇔ P + Q For a mixture of gases (NB you could do equiv calculation assuming solutions instead): ∆rG = vpμp(pP) + vQμQ(pQ) - vAμA(pA) - vBμB(pB) Assume all species are gaseous μ(pi) = μoi + RT ln(pi/po) Then sub in chemical potential expressions ∆rG = vp(μoP + RT ln(pp/po)) + vQ(…) - vA(…) - vB(…) Gather together the standard chemical potentials ∆rG = (vpμoP + vQμoQ - vAμoA - vBμoB) + vpRT ln(pp/po) + vQ(…) - vA(…) - vB(…) Quantity in bracket = ∆rGo. Put the stoichoimetric coefficients onto the ln terms So ∆rG = ∆rGo + RT ln(pp/po)vp + …etc Then gather the ln terms, from here on see image

Card back image
#6
Front (Question)

CaCO3(s) ⇔ CaO(s) + CO2(g) Derive an expression for ΔrGo at equilibrium.

Back (Answer)

ΔrG = µ(CO2) + µ(CaO) - µ(CaCO3) For the solids, µ = µo. For CO2 gas, write in terms of partial pressure, recalling µi(pi) = µoi + RTln(pi/po) ΔrG = µo(CO2) + µo(CaO) - µo(CaCO3) + RTln(pCO2/po) ΔrG = [µo(CO2) + µo(CaO) - µo(CaCO3)] + RTln(pCO2/po) Quantity in [] = ΔrGo ΔrG = ΔrGo + RTln(pCO2/po) At equilibrium, ΔrG = 0, so: ΔrGo = -RTln(pCO2,eq/po) This demonstrates that, although solids/liquids don’t contribute to the expression for the eq constant K, they do still contribute to ΔrGo, and so they affect the value of K indirectly

#7
Front (Question)

• Rearrange the standard Gibbs energy equation to make K the subject • Use this to explain how the sign of the standard Gibbs energy predicts the position of equilibrium

Back (Answer)

Card back image
#8
Front (Question)

reaction with +ve change in standard gibbs energy proceeds to some extent. overall, going from reactants to products is associated with a rise in gibbs energy, so this isn’t spontaneous and doesn’t occur. however, it’s not a straight line from reactants to products – it’s a curve which falls then rises. at the minimum of the curve is where gibbs energy is at a minimum. this is the eq composition. Use this graph to demonstrate the basis of Le Chatelier’s principle, e.g. why the act of removing products (altering concentration) is counteracted.

Card front image
Back (Answer)

• removing product increases proportion of reactant in mixture • graph moves from eq position to position marked a • to return from a to eq is associated with a decrease in gibbs energy, therefore spontaneous • so some reactants reform products to counteract the change

#9
Front (Question)

• Derive the temperature-dependence of the equilibrium constant • Use this to explain why, for an endothermic reaction, increasing temperature shifts eq to products, and vice versa

Back (Answer)

Derivation Recall ΔrGo = -RTlnK and also ΔrGo = ΔrHo - TΔrSo So -RTlnK = ΔrHo - TΔrSo Divide through by -RT lnK = -(ΔrHo/R)(1/T) + (ΔrSo/R) Interpretation Assume ΔrHo and ΔrSo are temperature-independent over a modest temperature range. • For an endothermic reaction, ΔrHo > 0, so -(ΔrHo/R)(1/T) is negative, so increasing T makes the term less negative, so lnK and thus K increase. Shifts eq towards products (increased K) • For an exothermic reaction, ΔrHo rHo/R)(1/T) is positive, so increasing T makes the term less positive, so lnK and thus K decrease. Shifts eq towards reactants (decreased K) NB this approach is only applicable for reactions which go to completion

#10
Front (Question)

Another method for determining the temperature-dependence of K uses the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation. Write it out

Back (Answer)

d/dT(G/T) = -H/T2 (constant pressure)

#11
Front (Question)

Another method for determining the temperature-dependence of K uses the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation: d/dT(G/T) = -H/T2 (constant pressure) Use this to derive the van’t Hoff equation: dlnK/dT = ΔrHo/RT2

Back (Answer)

d/dT(G/T) = -H/T2 (constant pressure) Replace with standard quantities d/dT(ΔrGo/T) = -ΔrHo/T2 (constant pressure) Sub in ΔrGo = -RTlnK –> ΔrGo/T = -RlnK d/dT(-RlnK) = -ΔrHo/T2 Divide through by -R dlnK/dT = ΔrHo/RT2

#12
Front (Question)

Another method for determining the temperature-dependence of K uses the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation to derive the van’t Hoff equation: dlnK/dT = ΔrHo/RT2 Use this to derive the temperature-dependence (should get the same result as before).

Back (Answer)

Card back image
#13
Front (Question)

For dissolved species, altering pressure doesn’t have a significant effect, but it does for gaseous species. State how pressure affects the equilibrium constant and composition.

Back (Answer)

• For a gas phase reaction, Kp and ∆rGo are related via ∆rGo = −RT lnKp, and ∆rGo is defned under standard conditions (pressure = 1 bar), so Kp does not vary with pressure • Composition of eq mixture changes in order to keep Kp constant

#14
Front (Question)

Consider the following equilibrium: A2(g) ⇔ 2A(g) Use the concept of the degree of dissociation to determine the pressure-dependence of the equilibrium composition.

Back (Answer)

Let α = degree of dissociation of dimer A2, i.e. the fraction which have dissociated, where α = 0 means no dissociation and α = 1 means full dissociation. n0 moles of A2 are allowed to reach eq at pressure ptot, giving degree of dissociation α. So neq,A2 = (1-α)no, and neq,A = 2αno, and therefore neq,total = (1+α)n0. Partial pressure of a species i: pi = xiptot Then write out the partial pressures of each species and derive the eq constant, then rearrange for α (image from here on).

Card back image
#15
Front (Question)

How do biological systems drive thermodynamically unfavourable reactions?

Back (Answer)

• Couple an unfavourable reaction (ΔrGo > 0) to a favourable one (ΔrGo​ > 0) such that overall (ΔrGo​ > 0), so the reaction can occur • Coupling occurs physically through connecting reactions closely, eg via an enzyme • Examples: • ATP hydrolysis is often the favourable reaction used to drive another, e.g. protein synthesis • ATP synthesis is therefore unfavourable; it is coupled to glucose oxidation • Photosynthetic production of glucose is not favourable, so is coupled to light energy