Back to marketplace

Organometallics [Andy Johnson]

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 24•Content version: v4•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (24)

#1
Front (Question)

early transition metals - groups 3,4

Back (Answer)

labile - anion and cation exchange easily high Zeff strongly electrophilic and oxophilic few redox reactions polar and v. reactive M-C bonds preference for “hard” σ-donors (non-polarisable) weak complexation of π-acceptors typical catalysis = polymerisation

#2
Front (Question)

middle transition metals - groups 5-7

Back (Answer)

ligands bound strongly strong, not v. reactive M-C bonds preference for σ-donor/π-acceptor combinations typical catalysis = alkene and alkyne metathesis

#3
Front (Question)

late transition metals - groups 8 - 11

Back (Answer)

easy ligand association/dissociation weak - not v. reactive M-C bonds even weaker/reactive M-O/M-N bonds preference for s-donor/weak π-acceptor ligands typical catalysis = hydroformylation

#4
Front (Question)

role of catalyst

Back (Answer)

lowers activation barrier by introducing a new reaction pathway ** doesn’t change thermodynamics **

#5
Front (Question)

why can sigma, pi and delta bonds be treated separately?

Back (Answer)

they overlap between different classes of orbitals (i.e. net overlap = 0)

#6
Front (Question)

criteria for strong orbital interactions

Back (Answer)

correct symmetry spatial overlap - must occupy same region in space similar energy

#7
Front (Question)

why can’t pi bonding occur in M-C alkyl bonds?

Back (Answer)

all available orbitals on C are involved in C-H/C-R bonding

#8
Front (Question)

why can’t pi bonding occur in M-C aryl bonds?

Back (Answer)

it would disrupt the aromaticity of the phenyl ring

#9
Front (Question)

what is the most stable state in an 18 e- system?

Back (Answer)

18 e- involved in bonding orbital 0 e- involved in anti-bonding orbital

#10
Front (Question)

L ligand

Back (Answer)

both electrons provided by ligand = dative covalent bond

#11
Front (Question)

X ligand

Back (Answer)

one electron provided by ligand and by metal = normal covalent bond

#12
Front (Question)

Z ligand

Back (Answer)

both electrons provided by metal = dative covalent bond

#13
Front (Question)

metallo

Back (Answer)

[metal separate from ring] metal “on” rather than “in” e.g. ferrocene

#14
Front (Question)

metalla

Back (Answer)

metal “in” ring

#15
Front (Question)

oxidation state (in terms of X ligands)

Back (Answer)

(number of X ligands) + (charge on complex)

#16
Front (Question)

bridging ligands

Back (Answer)

halides often bridge between 2 metal centres using a lone pair = LX X = sigma bond L = donor bond

#17
Front (Question)

metal-metal bonds

Back (Answer)

[doesn’t add to oxidation state] assign one of the electrons of the electron pair in a single to each metal centre double, triple, quadruple -> 2,3,4 respectively

#18
Front (Question)

NO molecules

Back (Answer)

radical BENT - acts as a 1 electron X ligand (l.p. on nitrogen not used) LINEAR - l.p. now can be used (LX)

#19
Front (Question)

electronic effects

Back (Answer)

late TM d8 -> square planar d10 -> trigonal -as Z increases, d-shell is stabilised -occupied dx2 orbital (perpendicular to plane) no longer involved in ligand bonding

#20
Front (Question)

steric effects

Back (Answer)

early TM have less d-electrons -> must achieve 18 e- count via larger ligands if ligands = too bulky, low-electron count complexes are formed

#21
Front (Question)

back-bonding

Back (Answer)

ligand donates sigma/non-bonding e- to metal while accepting e- density through overlap of metal t2g orbital and ligand π* ^ ligand = both sigma donor and π acceptor

#22
Front (Question)

what happens as the amount of pi e- density donated into pi* ligand increases?

Back (Answer)

more backhanding/electron density in ligand anti bonding orbital weakens CO bond bond lengthens lowers CO stretching frequency

#23
Front (Question)

why is there an increase in CO frequency/bond order across the periodic table group?

Back (Answer)

d orbital energies decrease/increase in electron density on M energies of dπ and π* orbitals separate back bonding becomes worse

#24
Front (Question)

non-classical carbonyls

Back (Answer)

major interaction = σ-donation from CO 5σ orbital (anti-bonding, l.p. on CO) to metal stretching frequency > free CO