Back to marketplace

Validity and Reliability

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 24•Content version: v4•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (24)

#1
Front (Question)

Define validity

Back (Answer)

• The degree to which the test or instrument measures what it is supposed to measure

#2
Front (Question)

What are the 4 types of validity

Back (Answer)

Logical or face Content Criterion Concurrent

#3
Front (Question)

Define logical or face validity

Back (Answer)

• Degree to which a measure involves the performance being measured • Not objective, hence not useful for research

#4
Front (Question)

Define content validity

Back (Answer)

• Usually applies to education settings - Degree to which the sample of items or questions on a test are representative of some defined content

#5
Front (Question)

Define criterion validity

Back (Answer)

• Degree to which scores on a test are related to some recognised standard or criterion

#6
Front (Question)

Define concurrent validity

Back (Answer)

• Type of criterion validity in which the scores from a measurement instrument are correlated with a criterion measure that is administered at the same time

#7
Front (Question)

Define reliability

Back (Answer)

• Relates to the consistency or repeatability of an observation

#8
Front (Question)

What is validity dependent on

Back (Answer)

Reliability and relevance

#9
Front (Question)

TO be valid a test must be what

Back (Answer)

reliable

#10
Front (Question)

A test can be x but not y

Back (Answer)

x = reliable y = valid

#11
Front (Question)

What is the reliability and classical test theory

Back (Answer)

• Test reliability is sometimes discussed in terms of observed score, true score, and error score

#12
Front (Question)

reliability and classical test theory equation

Back (Answer)

• Observed score = True score + Error score

#13
Front (Question)

How can reliability been expressed

Back (Answer)

• Can be expressed by a correlation coefficient, ranging from -1.00 to 1.00

#14
Front (Question)

Define interrater reliability

Back (Answer)

inter-rater reliability is the degree of agreement among raters.

#15
Front (Question)

What correlation do u use for two measures, and what for more than two

Back (Answer)

Pearson r = two Intraclass correlation = for more then two

#16
Front (Question)

what correlation is used for interrater reliability

Back (Answer)

Kappa

#17
Front (Question)

What is the correlation range

Back (Answer)

• 1.00 to 1.00

#18
Front (Question)

What does the Pearson r tell us

Back (Answer)

It gives information about the magnitude of the association, or correlation, as well as the direction of the relationship between variables.

#19
Front (Question)

Explain the correlation ranges from 0 to + 1

Back (Answer)

.80 - 1: Very strong positive .60 - 79: Strong positive .40 - 59: Moderate positive .20 - 39: Weak positive .0 - 19: Very weak positive

#20
Front (Question)

Explain the correlation ranges from 0 to - 1

Back (Answer)

• 1.00 to - 0.80: Very strong negative • 0.79 to - 0.60: strong negative • 0.59 to - 0.40: moderate negative • 0.39 to - 0.20: weak negative • 0.19 to -0.01: very weak negative

#21
Front (Question)

Define internal consistency reliability

Back (Answer)

nternal consistency reliability is a way to gauge how well a test or survey is actually measuring what you want it to measure.

#22
Front (Question)

What does test-rest measure

Back (Answer)

It reflects the variation in measurements taken by an instrument on the same subject under the same conditions

#23
Front (Question)

Threats to external validity

Back (Answer)

Hawthorne effect Demand characteristics

#24
Front (Question)

Threats to internal validity

Back (Answer)

• Maturation • History • Statistical regression: An initial extreme score is likely to be followed by less extreme subsequent scores • Instrumentation e.g. Uncalibrated equipment • Selection Bias, e.g. Groups not randomly assigned