Back to marketplace

Tutorials

No description yet. This curated deck is ready for daily study.

Total cards: 24•Content version: v3•Public deck•Updated: 8/1/2026

Card preview (24)

#1
Front (Question)

The US’s underlying strategy to drugs:

Back (Answer)

Cut supply chain, eradicate use however possible

#2
Front (Question)

He suggested that drugs should be treated as a public health problem that is intrusive to freedom.

Back (Answer)

Thomas Szasz

#3
Front (Question)

What is the libertarian self ownership argument for drugs?

Back (Answer)

People can do what they want, drugs should be in the free market

#4
Front (Question)

Consumption may increase depending on the price of the commodity, deals may turn to violent crime. Who said it?

Back (Answer)

Adams

#5
Front (Question)

The risk of imprisonment/fine is minimal compared to the relaxation and enjoyment it brings.

Back (Answer)

Revealed preference theory

#6
Front (Question)

This involves the production of rewards without causes inside the brain. It is a moral concern, and wouldn’t apply if the drug had no adverse effects.

Back (Answer)

Reward system in the brain

#7
Front (Question)

Husak argued that these are exaggerated, and don’t justify current regulations that violate individual rights.

Back (Answer)

Third party harm

#8
Front (Question)

Why are harms difficult to study?

Back (Answer)

Mixed substances, samples, flaky participants

#9
Front (Question)

De Marneffe argued that some drugs risk life for this group therefore prohibition is good.

Back (Answer)

Children

#10
Front (Question)

De Marneffe proposed the idea that individuals are bad at seeking long term interests because of this: therefore, punishment is needed.

Back (Answer)

Short term gratification

#11
Front (Question)

Why could gambling by children become a problem even with supervision?

Back (Answer)

There is a risk that they will develop problems later in life because big wins early create expectations

#12
Front (Question)

How does gambling harm the gambler?

Back (Answer)

Addiction

#13
Front (Question)

The police couldn’t enforce laws against gambling so they used this approach:

Back (Answer)

Unstimulated demand

#14
Front (Question)

What did the Gambling Act of 1968 permit?

Back (Answer)

Licenses to get rid of unscrupulous acts

#15
Front (Question)

How does gambling harm others?

Back (Answer)

Neglect of family, especially children, taxpayer burden

#16
Front (Question)

The state should be neutral between these:

Back (Answer)

Competing concepts of the good

#17
Front (Question)

This allows people to take into account the safety of what they purchase as one element in quality.

Back (Answer)

Free market in safety

#18
Front (Question)

Why is safety regulation good?

Back (Answer)

Consumer protection

#19
Front (Question)

Why is it illegal to buy some goods?

Back (Answer)

The risk of harm/death is too high

#20
Front (Question)

These third party effects involve dumping costs. Negative are most common.

Back (Answer)

Externalities

#21
Front (Question)

What is the conflict between two moral standpoints when it comes to safety?

Back (Answer)

Efficiency and spending on what saves the most lives

#22
Front (Question)

What is the consequentialist view on safety?

Back (Answer)

Do the most good with the resources available

#23
Front (Question)

The right thing is what we’ve always done or what we’re commanded by God to do.

Back (Answer)

The utilitarian view on safety

#24
Front (Question)

The measure is only required if it is good for humans.

Back (Answer)

Liberating doctrine